Date: 10th February 2010 at 11:00am
Written by:

A few weeks ago we went down to Manchester United at Old Trafford 3-0. This was Brian Laws first game in charge and despite the defeat there were a number of positives to take from the match and we received a number of plaudits. The criticism was that we didn`t take our chances and Laws admitted himself that at times we were a little ‘Gung-Ho` and had to tighten up in defence.

Well against Fulham at Craven Cottage last night we lost 3-0 again and the problem this time was that we didn`t create ANY chances and were in fact more ‘dung-ho` than ‘gung-ho` This match would be my candidate by far as our worst performance on the road in the Premier League this season even beating the recent frustrating game at the Reebok against Susan Boyle`s Bolton. We were woeful in defence, clueless in midfield and may as well have played 4-6-0 such was the ineffectiveness of both Fletcher and Nugent. This is simply not good enough and was so disappointing after the highs against West Ham on Saturday. We simply can`t string two good games together and you have to go back to August before we had back-to-back League wins (against Manchester United and Everton at Turf Moor). Disappointing is just one word but there are numerous other D words you could take from this mauling. Dross, dire, dreadful, diabolical, disaster…but you get the idea with that!

If this was a battle of tactical wits, Roy Hodgson had done his homework better than Laws. He certainly got his side to stifle any chances we tried to create with everything it seemed snuffed out by their defence. It looked like our only option was to shoot from distance and those attempts were few and far between and I don`t recall their keeper being properly tested all night. Things were not much better at the other end with Edgar in particular looking exposed at left back and Jensen having a poor night. The Beast seemed at fault with all the goals and had problems communicating with the back-four at times. It probably didn`t help also losing Cort to injury in the first half after just 32 minutes although that did allow Fox to go back into his more familiar left back position with Edgar now playing in the centre of defence. Eagles came on to replace Cort but again he seemed subdued and ineffective.

Our best spell if that`s what you can call it was probably the opening few minutes of the match when we seemed to have most of the possession but could not make any of it tell. Two Fulham goals in eight minutes virtually killed off our chances though when first Murphy put the Cottagers ahead on 23 minutes before Elm doubled their lead on 31 minutes. There was a suspicion of offside for both goals but Fulham deserved to be ahead based on our lacklustre performance.

In the second-half Fulham killed off the game when pesky Zamora scored their third goal from a direct free kick after 54 minutes

The defeat at Fulham means we drop one place to 16th but we could find ourselves back in the relegation zone tonight with Bolton and Portsmouth if both West Ham and Wolves win their home games against Birmingham and Spurs respectively. We now have a break until the 21st February with the FA Cup fifth round ties being played next Saturday and Laws is taking his squad to sunny climes for some team-bonding and training in Portugal. He will certainly need to shake them up after this very poor performance considering our next game is against Aston Villa at Villa Park. Villa currently in 7th spot are chasing a Top 4 finish and make no mistake about it, if we play against them like we did against Fulham we will be absolutely massacred.

The Clarets Team Sheet

Brian Laws according to Owls fans had a reputation at Sheffield Wednesday for selecting players out of their normal positions; he seems to be continuing that tradition with the Clarets! Danny Fox had been brought in we thought to tighten up our defence at left-back whereas David Edgar is more renown for being a centre back. It was perhaps surprising therefore that Laws decided to play Edgar at left-back a role he has played a couple of the times for the Clarets recently but play Fox in front of him on the left side of midfield. This was the only change Laws made to the eighteen he selected for our previous game against West Ham at Turf Moor last Saturday. Robbie Blake was the unfortunate casualty of the change and was dropped back to the bench. Chelsea loan midfielder, Jack Cork also had to be content with a place on the bench for his second game since arriving in the January window.

The line-up in summary was as follows:

Jensen, Mears, Carlisle, Cort, Edgar, Bikey, Elliott. McDonald, Fox, Nugent, Fletcher.

Subs: Weaver, Duff, Eagles, Cork, Blake, Thompson, Paterson

The Full Match Report

A cold night on the banks of the Thames was about to get even more bitter for Clarets fans as the match got underway. Steve Bennett was in charge of this match despite Chris Foy being the referee scheduled to referee the game. In the early stages of this match, the Clarets had most of the possession and looked most likely to score with Kevin McDonald in particular aided by Andre Bikey trying to get the engine room stoked-up to keep all Clarets fans warm and toasty. There were no real chances though and a familiar pattern on the road then began to develop as Fulham came back into the game. . A routing save by Jensen from a tame shot by Elms fell to Mears who under no real danger conceded a corner. The scene for nervousness and panic in the back four was now set and Fulham could sense things were swinging their way. All the pressure was now in our half and on 23 minutes the inevitable happened with the Cottagers taking the lead helped by some poor decisions by the linesman and referee. As a ball came over from Shorey, Elms looked to be in an offside position before heading down to Danny Murphy. Play continued though and Murphy tucked the ball home from six yards out to put Fulham 1-0 up.

In a rare attack Burnley responded almost immediately after McDonald linked well to set up Fletcher but the striker put his shot wide. If Clarets fans were hoping that was the start of a fight back we would be sadly mistaken with Fulham once more taking over the reins in complete control. Jensen prevented Etuhu from doubling the lead but it was only a matter of time before we went further behind such was the dominance by Roy Hodgson`s men.

On 31 minutes, Zamora was allowed to run on despite clearly being behind the back four in an offside position. He got in a low shot which Jensen partially saved. The Beast could not hold onto the ball though and it fell to Elms who scored with a simple tap-in. We were now 2-0 down thanks to two poor refereeing decisions but even so we cannot really use that as an excuse in view of Fulham`s total dominance and possession up to that point.

It got worse for the Clarets when Cort limped off with an injury a minute later. Laws had to make some readjustments with Eagles coming on in midfield, Edgar taking over from Cort in the centre of defence and Fox dropping back to his more familiar left-back role.

Our only real chance in the whole game came from a set-piece towards the end of the first half after being awarded a direct free kick 25 yards out. Up stepped Mears to thump a curling shot which grazed the crossbar. Danny Fox also hit a set-piece straight at Mark Schwarzer, a far cry from his superb effort and goal in the previous game against West Ham at Turf Moor.

Laws made no further changes at half-time and the second half resumed more or less as the first one had finished with Fulham in complete control and the Clarets looking clueless. It only took them nine minutes of the second half to put this game beyond our reach.

Zamora had been causing the Clarets all sorts of problems and he almost added a third goal when the ball fell kindly to him the area. Jensen though got down well to palm his low strike around the post. Our defence could not cope with his pace and strength though and during one attack Edgar was culpable in bringing him down on the edge of the penalty area with 54 minutes played.

Communication problems between Jensen and the wall opened up a gap which Zamora spotted and he thumped a low left-footed curler into the bottom corner of the net with Jensen diving too late to save it.

Job done, Zamora and Duff were substituted but the relentless Fulham pressure continued with Clarets fans fearing that a tonking was on the cards. It was Jensen who denied them a fourth goal after Okaka was put through by Murphy who was now running towards goal. The Beast in a good position got his legs into action to halt progress.

There was one final chance to rub salt in the Clarets fans wounds when in the dying few seconds of the match, a volley by Okaka went thankfully wide.

This is certainly one match that Clarets fans will want to instantly forget and the only cheerful news on the night was the fact that at least Manchester City had beaten Bolton 2-0 at Eastlands which meant Susan Boyle`s mob would still be below us!

Match Detail

Fulham: Schwarzer, Baird, Hughes, Hangeland, Shorey, Duff (Riise 77), Murphy, Etuhu, Davies (Greening 62), Elm, Zamora (Okaka 71.

Subs Not Used: Kelly, Nevland, Smalling, Zuberbuhler.

Goals: Murphy 23 Elm 31 Zamora 54

Booked: Yellow Card for Etuhu

Burnley: Jensen, Mears, Carlisle, Cort (Eagles 32), Edgar, Bikey, Elliott (Cork 56). McDonald, Fox, Nugent (Paterson 76), Fletcher.

Subs Not Used: Subs: Weaver, Duff, Blake, Thompson

Booked: 0

Possession: Fulham 54% Burnley 46% (Source: BBC Sport)

Referee: Steve Bennett (Kent)

 

42 Replies to “New Lows in Fulham Debacle”

  • Have briefly skim read that article Phil and agree with almost all of it. The chanting from the away end was brilliant and we could hear it well away from the stadium ( we also made an early dart for the tube). Fulham were well organised ( again) and we simply did not have the quality to do anything about it.

  • Simply awful, just can’t understand how we can blow so hot and cold after West Ham and Chelsea. Laws needs to get on top of this, he still has to prove his worth to Clarets fans and I am not sure how many more defeats like this we will be able to endure before an element of the crowd begin to turn on the new gaffer. He has promised to keep the passing game but tighten up defence, in so doing we seem to have lost the plot. Maybe ‘gung-ho’ was better afterall at least it was exciting and you felt we might score. That was certainly not the case last night

  • I wasn’t at the game, but to add to what CD said about the chanting from the away end on 2BR, they commented on this saying”the supporters were fantastic and everyone should be proud of them even 3-0 down and they were still singing and cheering the team on”. So a big crongratulations to all who were there you did us proud.

  • I didnt think we were very good against WHU to be honest. The first 20 we were the better team but other than that I thought WHU deserved a point at the very least. As for our ‘less gung-ho style’, What I will say is that the last 3 away games ( Reading, Bolton, Leeds) are probably our 3 of our 4 worst away performances of the season – Wolves being the other. Is this down to the revised approach from Laws – or have our boys simply lost belief?

  • A depressing night. Even the lads on ClaretsPlayer became subdued. I couldn’t stand it after the third goal went in and slunk off for an early bath. First time I’ve done that this season.

  • Hard to take any positives from the game apart from the crowd, Let us hope a bit of bonding in Portugal will refresh us in time time for Villa.

  • I think I agree about Wade Phil, he looks to be lacking confidence now and at times I thought he was hiding last night. However, If you replace him with Cork, would this not make us very narrow?

  • You may have a point CD,what has Guerrero done so wrong to not even be in contention now? Elliott though has played inside midfield on a few occasions and we have coped but we can’t keep carryng him if hes not performing. Perhaps we could have a five man midfield with one up front-Bikey, Eagles, Cork, McCann or McDonald, Blake, Fletcher?. Having said that Eagles has not been too impressive either recently! Oh woe is me!!

  • Hmmm – I dont really know what to say. I was so keen to have Big Kev in the side, but now he is – he isnt really performing ( Pompey aside). Blake, unfortunately, I dont think can do it consistently anymore. Mccann and Alexander I assume will both start when fit. But who plays in the rest of the midfield, I really dont know. Maybe Fox will play one side with Eagles on the other? Or Maybe we will see Pato play on one side of a 4-5-1? I feel very sorry for Fernando – It cannot be easy for a young lad this far from home and he isnt even playing! ( This is more down to Owen than Laws). I just cannot see that he will now get his chance with Laws already saying he feels we are too gung ho and FG would only increase this.

  • New players gave me hope, sadly we seem to have gone backwards. Sticking my neck out, what about Jenson: Fox, Cort, Carlisle, Mears: Blake, McDonald, Alexander, Bikey, Eagles: Nugent.

  • CD’s perceptive analysis of the situation Guerrero finds himself in suggests that we are now struggling to fix problems Laws inherited, rather than ones he has created. The psychological impact last night of being coached to keep it tight, then lose two goals to dodgy decisions and your big new defender to injury… it must have been huge. So, for reasons to be cheerful this week, we have to look at the financial mess in Portsmouth, the internal squabbling over the looming financial mess in West Ham, and the arrival in Bolton of the man who brought Guerrero to East Lancs for no apparent squad-related logic.

  • We deserved the win on the whole, but the officials did you no favors by blowing those offside calls. My condolences. You’ll survive. You work too hard not to. Good luck with the rest of the campaign.

  • Cheers Teddy thats very sporting of you. Every report I have read says the same I only say the match through a computer link but 2 of the goals were offside still Fulham were better than us.

  • Nice to get a comment from a good sport, you are absolutely right Teddy we deserved to lose. Sadly, we have also lost when we deserved to win. We certainly do not seem to be getting our share of luck or debatable decisions , perhaps that will change soon, we need it to.

  • I do agree Cornwall – Luck doesnt seem to be with us on a number of occasions – although I would argue we did have some on Saturday against WHU. Is it a case of you make your own luck? Why do lose balls always seem to drop to the opposition?

  • Luck can be a feature if you play well or badly. When you play badly, you maybe don’t deserve the luck and that was certainly the case last night! Fulham also had us sussed especially in defence

Comments are closed.